>>937
New infiltration just dropped.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn8xykr5v95o
>[Patriotic Alternative] should be banned and some members investigated by police, the BBC has been told, after we secretly filmed people in the group saying migrants should be shot.
>An undercover BBC reporter spent a year investigating the far-right group and its members were recorded using racial slurs.
(oh come on BBC, 'using racial slurs', you later talk about these fascists claiming they're "buying a pump-action shotgun now", destroying evidence of crimes, advocating 1920s NSDAP tactics, calling for mass extermination, but oh fug they said a bad word)
This, again, illustrates one of the problems with the Nazi/fascist organisation strategy: they're two-faced.
Consider most socialist orgs. They're basically the same in public as they are in private. Maybe there's some slight change in rhetoric to cater to their audience, but largely, they're sincere and open about their views. There's nothing to hide from (liberal) police, because this is a mass movement strategy. An undercover cop could walk into your meetings and there's really no game-changing information they would gain.
Neo-Nazis, on the other hand, generally present a facade of civility and non-violence which does not match their group on the inside. Behind the closed doors, this mask is dropped, and suddenly it's all heil-hitler-race-terror-now-buy-guns fedbait.
A big problem with this is that some of the teenagers they groom grow up, and the conservative liberals who thought they were just a racist protest group realise this is a genocide and terrorism cult, and they end up flipping or snitching. Many such cases.
Another is that if they want to grow to a substantial size, they must either live in debilitating paranoia or risk an infiltrator revealing their organisation's true self. Or, more likely, both, where they end up alienating themselves with paranoid anonymity but get infiltrated and identified anyway! See >>626
